8月30日
The Houston Chronicle has an article about
Chinese victims of forced abortions fighting back.
QIAN'AN, China — Yang Zhongchen, a small-town businessman, wined and
dined three government officials for permission to become a father.
But the Peking duck and liquor weren't enough. One night, a couple
of weeks before her date for giving birth, Yang's wife was dragged from
her bed in a north China town and taken to a clinic, where, she says,
her baby was killed by injection while still inside her.
"Several people held me down, they ripped my clothes aside and the
doctor pushed a large syringe into my stomach," says Jin Yani, a shy,
petite woman with a long ponytail. "It was very painful. ... It was all
very rough."
Some 30 years after China decreed a general limit of one child per
family, resentment still brews over the state's regular and sometimes
brutal intrusion into intimate family matters. Not only are many second
pregnancies aborted, but even to have one's first child requires a
license.
Seven years after the dead baby was pulled from her body with
forceps, Jin remains traumatized and, the couple and a doctor say,
unable to bear children. Yang and Jin have made the rounds of
government offices pleading for restitution — to no avail.
This year, they took the unusual step of suing the family planning
agency. The judges ruled against them, saying Yang and Jin conceived
out of wedlock. Local family planning officials said Jin consented to
the abortion. The couple's appeal to a higher court is pending.
The one-child policy applies to most families in this nation of 1.3
billion people, and communist officials, often under pressure to meet
birth quotas set by the government, can be coldly intolerant of
violators.
My question is this: Where is Amnesty International on this? What are they doing to
help the Chinese people from having their rights (and the rights of their unborn children) violated? (I mean aside from
pushing for abortion to be a "universal right".)
Quick quiz: who said, "Violence cannot be answered by further violence, murder by murder"? If you answered "Amnesty International", you're wrong. These are actually the words of Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone, in response to Amnesty International saying that abortions are needed in Darfur because of the use of rape as a form of torture. It's the old "2 wrongs don't make a right", and abortion is
not a right!
[Note: although there has been some press about pro-life rockers and the "Instant Karma" "Relief for Darfur" CD, there is not yet any evidence, one way or the other, that specific artists (like Christina Aguilera or Avril Livigne) are in fact pro-life, offended, or possibly pulling out of the project.]
Tags: abortion, Amnesty International, pro-life, China, Vatican, Christina Aguilera, Avril Livigne8月27日
Again, I will refer you to G.K. Chesterton's eerily prescient
Eugenics and Other Evils. If you honestly think abortion is a victimless process,
read on.
Botched abortion shocks Italy
August 27, 2007
Rome
- A botched abortion in which a healthy twin foetus was terminated
instead of its sibling with Down syndrome has reignited the abortion
debate in Italy and raised allegations of eugenics.
"The time has come to re-examine the abortion law" that dates back to
1978, wrote leftist Senator Paola Binetti, who is close to the Vatican,
in the Corriere della Sera newspaper.
"What happened in this hospital was not a medical abortion but an
abortion done for the purposes of eugenics," she said, referring to the
belief that the human species can be improved through selective
reproduction.
The abortion was performed on a 38-year-old woman in Milan in June, but
news of its outcome has only recently become public. Doctors blamed the
mistake on movement of the foetuses between the examination and the
abortion. [ed.: How about blaming the mistake on trying to kill a baby in the first place?]
"They
wanted to kill the sick foetus and save the healthy one and what didn't
work properly in this business was the selection," Binetti wrote.
Tags: abortion, eugenics, pro-life, Italy